
Seeking clarity in prior authorization data from insurers
Key Takeaways
- CMS directed payers to post prior-authorization metrics on public-facing sites; password-protected portals or buried documents do not meet the “publicly accessible” standard.
- Plans must enumerate all items and services requiring prior authorization, closing gaps cited by physicians for behavioral health and post-acute care.
The federal government is clarifying requirements from health plans. The AMA cited problems in getting information from insurance companies.
The American Medical Association is citing progress in getting more information from health insurance companies about prior authorization policies.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has
The AMA says it welcomes the new federal guidance. The nation’s largest organization representing physicians had said insurers were providing incomplete information that was difficult for consumers to find, much less understand if they did discover it.
Willie Underwood III, MD, president of the AMA, said in a news release that plans submitted information that wasn’t in plan language, or was only accessible after signing in via patient portals.
“Patients should not need a portal password, a billing manual or medical training to find and understand a health plan’s prior authorization practices,” Underwood said in a statement.
Here are a few key elements of the new CMS guidance.
Making it public
CMS is making it clear that patients should be able to get on a health plan’s site and get information about prior authorization policies.
“Posting the required metrics only through password-protected provider or member portals or in other locations that cannot be reached through ordinary navigation from the payer’s public-facing website does not satisfy the ‘publicly accessible’ requirement of the final rule,” CMS says.
Specify services requiring approval
Health plans must clearly outline all medical items and services that require prior authorization, CMS says.
The AMA argued that insurers weren’t always including certain services requiring approval, including behavioral health and post-acute services.
Understandable language
CMS is telling health plans that they must provide “plain language descriptions of each item or service” that falls under prior authorization requirements.
More specifics on time
Health plans are advised that they have to use specific measurements of time, such as calendar days or hours. If a turnaround time is less than a day, plans should specify how many hours, instead of “0 days.”
Charts and numbers
CMS says insurers should use bar charts and pie charts to present data on delays in approval decisions. The administration also wants more precise data.
“We highly recommend reporting both counts and percentages so the public can understand the scope of requests,” CMS says.
A long-running battle
Doctors and health systems have long argued that
Insurers say the prior authorization process is necessary to contain healthcare costs and to curb unnecessary procedures.
Health plans are also working under new federal rules to speed up the timelines on approval requests. Insurers must respond within 72 hours for expedited requests, and within seven days for standard requests. Previously, insurers had twice as long to respond. The rules took effect Jan. 1, 2026, but they were approved in 2024.
Physicians have said even the revised timelines are too long, and that approvals, particularly in urgent cases, should come more quickly. In May, the AMA sent a
Insurers also are required to disclose denial rates to CMS, and how long they are taking to make decisions on authorization requests.















































