It’s safer than FaceTime and better than telehealth.
Image licensed from Adobe Stock.
The idea of virtual care is easy to grasp, and the benefits are quickly understood. But implementing virtual care technology can be challenging unless organizations are prepared to contend with (and triumph over) challenges, including:
These issues can become even more complex when healthcare organizations seek to implement virtual care that goes beyond traditional telehealth communication methods to engage patients. However, the challenges of including more robust functionality in a virtual care communication platform are offset by the expansion of patient access to more timely and higher quality care, in a more resource-effective manner.
A virtual care communication platform uses a range of media — including video, text, secure messaging and email — to do more than just check up on patients. The platform is critical to engaging patients in their healthcare on a regular basis, while also enabling providers to access consults from offsite/remote colleagues on a timely basis. Virtual care can improve care delivery, optimize workflows and staff productivity and enhance patient engagement, avoiding excess costs along the way.
Although healthcare organizations may have concerns when considering virtual care, there are several strategies to overcome these issues.
Access to broadband — at a patient’s home or at a healthcare facility — can be restricted. In rural communities, limited access to adequate broadband may deter organizations from deploying virtual care technology.
In order to provide all populations better access to care, healthcare organizations should not be stymied by the limitations of today’s broadband situation. While the broadband infrastructure continues to be built throughout the U.S., healthcare organizations can overcome this hurdle by selecting a virtual care platform that can work on cellular and Wi-Fi connectivity. Using platforms designed to work on any level of connectivity, providers have increased flexibility for delivering timely consults via video, and rural patients have improved access to care via cellular or limited broadband connection, which is especially important if they are geographically isolated. Continued investments in broadband infrastructure and adoption should eventually extend virtual care to at-home patients, such as those in rural communities.
Another concern is whether a healthcare organization needs to invest in specific equipment (carts, flat screens, etc.) to deliver virtual care at its facility, or whether the organization must consider absorbing the cost of these devices to allow patients to securely access care from the convenience and comfort of their home.
Fortunately, organizations may select a platform that works on any device — smartphone, tablet or computer — which most providers and patients already own. The flexibility of a platform that does not require specific hardware means that an organization can deploy a platform that is already future-proof (as large carts quickly become outdated and too large to move quickly around a facility) and considers individual preference for specific devices and operating systems. Virtual care fits into a patient’s lifestyle if they are already comfortable with using computers, smartphones or tablets.
When and how should healthcare organizations involve IT in the decision-making and deployment process for virtual care technology?
Although providers will likely be the true champions (and users) of introducing a virtual care communication platform, IT leaders will need to understand the benefits of virtual care and how it can be part of near-term workstreams versus a future state. The IT department may be concerned by existing projects and other investments that are ready to deploy and might not understand how critical virtual care can be to the broader organization’s ability to deliver timely, quality and cost-effective care. An IT assessment should be completed early in the discussions about implementing virtual care technology. Providers can help ease IT’s anxieties by identifying the first use case(s) where it will be easiest to implement from a technological standpoint and/or most critical to deploy from the care delivery perspective. Instead of trying to deploy a platform throughout all facilities, departments and care settings, IT can optimize the initial rollout before expanding across the organization.
Given the complications of implementing electronic health record (EHR) solutions in recent years, many healthcare organizations are wary about how to integrate new technologies into their workflows.
In order to achieve seamless integration of a virtual care platform, healthcare organizations should work with their virtual care partner to conduct a workflow analysis to understand how the virtual care platform fits in with current clinical practices. Virtual care should be thought of as “just another method” of delivering healthcare, as opposed to a disruptive, new way to practice medicine. Virtual care protocols should be consistent with existing, in-person protocols. This will help providers feel more comfortable in adopting virtual care and delivering care using technology on a regular basis. Additional tips include:
HIPAA compliance, along with platform reliability and security, are common apprehensions of providers and their IT colleagues. Some providers may even assume they can use existing communication platforms — such as Facetime or Skype — to communicate with colleagues and patients. It helps if all involved understand the need for (and value of) a safe and secure communication platform.
First, providers and patients likely already communicate in their personal lives via the cloud. However, all parties need to remember that healthcare communication is a serious matter and must be enacted in the most secure manner possible. Communication platforms that are HIPAA-compliant are table-stakes at this point. Now, healthcare organizations should also understand the need to have a HIPAA-compliant and HITRUST-certified platform to ensure security, privacy and compliance.
Exceeding the healthcare industry’s benchmarks and regulations is critical for healthcare organizations seeking to deliver virtual care that is safer than FaceTime and better than telehealth. Tech-based communication platforms can keep providers focused on caregiving by helping manage their time and effectiveness. The platform can keep patients engaged in their care by helping to facilitate convenient access to their providers. And the platform can ensure that IT departments and the broader healthcare organizations are optimizing the use of available resources while enhancing the overall outcomes for all stakeholders.
Lee Horner is the CEO of Synzi.
Get the best insights in healthcare analytics directly to your inbox.