• Politics
  • Diversity, equity and inclusion
  • Financial Decision Making
  • Telehealth
  • Patient Experience
  • Leadership
  • Point of Care Tools
  • Product Solutions
  • Management
  • Technology
  • Healthcare Transformation
  • Data + Technology
  • Safer Hospitals
  • Business
  • Providers in Practice
  • Mergers and Acquisitions
  • AI & Data Analytics
  • Cybersecurity
  • Interoperability & EHRs
  • Medical Devices
  • Pop Health Tech
  • Precision Medicine
  • Virtual Care
  • Health equity

Podcast: The Holocaust Survivor Who Forced Us to Face Burnout


Data Book tells the story of Herbert Freudenberger, Ph.D., who came up with the term “burnout.” KOLs then discuss how health tech can fight physician burnout.

In the early 1970s, no one was discussing burnout. The condition was hardly recognized, and the term itself had yet to be devised. “Burnout” didn’t burst into the public consciousness until Herbert Freudenberger, Ph.D., a psychologist who spent his days practicing in New York City and his nights volunteering at a free clinic, started writing about the phenomenon. His work on “burn-out” resonated deeply and built the foundation for today’s discussions on moral injury in medicine and beyond.

In this episode of Data Book, we examine Freudenberger’s work to define and analyze occupational burnout. What led this man — a Holocaust survivor whose commitment to mental health caused him to work 14-hour days — to exert great energy searching for solutions to a problem that persists today? The answer is simple: Freudenberger and his colleagues at the free clinic experienced burnout themselves.

Delving into the history of our understanding of burnout is not a trivial exercise. We decided to explore Freudenberger’s work for a couple of reasons. For one, the timeline points to our relatively new acknowledgement of a condition that has likely existed, in some form, for far longer than we can measure. At the same time, many of the institutional pain points and potential causes that Freudenberger documented remain relevant to the burnout conversation. Although our grasp on burnout is young, organizations surely have had enough time to implement stronger practices for prevention and response. Yet here we are.

Finally, Freudenberger argued that burnout most affected people who were committed. The professionals who work long, grueling hours in their quest to deliver something of value to society. And the people who, at some point, find that their work has become routine and boring. Despite being nearly 50 years old, that description applies to many of today’s doctors — and it continues to enter conversations on physician burnout.

What insights can we draw from Freudenberger’s early examination of burnout? What has changed since the 1970s and what has stayed the same? And how can we enact meaningful change to reduce physician burnout? Let us know your thoughts on Twitter.

Also in this episode, Data Book turns to an expert panel for a discussion on how health tech can influence culture, potentially curbing physician burnout. Geeta Nayyar, M.D., MBA, moderates the talk, which features Rasu Shrestha, M.D., MBA, Janae Sharp and Geneia’s Heather Lavoie.

Perhaps, they argue, the healthcare system’s regulations, reimbursements and incentives must change if our doctors are to heal.

Get the best insights in digital health directly to your inbox.


Physician Burnout: Health Tech’s Potential to Impact Culture

Podcast: Nuance, Tech & Fighting Physician Burnout

The Slow, Frustrating Rise of the EHR

Related Videos
Image: Ron Southwick, Chief Healthcare Executive
George Van Antwerp, MBA
Edmondo Robinson, MD
Craig Newman
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.